The Supreme Court's decision upholding the individual mandate in the health care law had a surprisingly large number of tax ramifications. Because much of the health care law was enacted through the Internal Revenue Code, the court's decision to let the law stand means that numerous tax provisions will take effect over the next few years. Many of those provisions involve health care, but some, such as the 3.8% tax on net investment income and the codified economic substance doctrine, don't, and may surprise taxpayers. Read More>>
MORE BLOGS
ACCOUNTING/FINANCE:
> AccountingWEB
> CFO
> CPA Legislative Insider
> CPA Trendlines
> Going Concern
> The Savvy CPA
> SocialCPAs
ACCOUNTING STUDENTS/CPA EXAM:
> Accounting Tomorrow
> Another 71
> CPA Exam Cram
STATE CPA SOCIETIES:
> Alabama: The Office
> Maryland: CPA Success
> Missouri
> New York: CPA.BLOG
> Ohio
> South Carolina: Keeping Balanced
> Texas: Governmental Affairs Blog
> Virginia: CPA Café
> Suggest a blog
« GASB Final Pronouncements Are Now Available as Free Downloads | Main | PCAOB Hears Further Debate over Audit Firm Rotation (via @AccountingToday) »
06/29/2012
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e009995e4c8833017615ee4722970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court's health care decision affects many tax provisions (via @AICPA_JofA):
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
OUR BLOGGERS
Don Meyer
NJSCPA Director of Communications & Marketing
Ridge Kennedy
NJSCPA Media Relations Specialist
Rachael Bell
NJSCPA Online Communications Manager
Gail Rosen, CPA
Gail Rosen CPA, PC
Categories
- Accounting & Auditing
- AICPA
- Banking
- CPA Careers
- CPA Exam
- CPE
- Economic Crisis
- Economy
- Employment
- FASB
- Financial Literacy
- IFRS
- Investing
- IRS
- Legal
- Legislation
- Members in the News
- NASBA
- New Jersey Accounting Firm News
- New Jersey State News
- NJSCPA News & Events
- PCAOB
- Personal Financial Planning
- Real Estate
- Regulatory Activities
- Sarbanes-Oxley
- SEC
- Small Business
- Social Media
- Taxation
- Technology
Actually, explain to me how gold would be atuconced for. Are you guys suggesting we do away with any kind of certificate or receipts of ownership? If not, what would you have people write up these certificates on? Would they be able to be electronic? Are you wanting people to transact in gold and silver coins or bars and that's it?
Posted by: Abhithvatakara | 09/17/2012 at 01:38 PM